Sustainability
Opinion Article
INVITED EDITOR
Editorial from
Manuel Antunes
Manuel Antunes is a Nova SBE alumnus.
July 16, 2024
13. Climate action

13. Climate action

Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts
LEARN MORE

The Carbon Story: Credits, Offsets, and Sinks

Manuel Antunes elaborates on how different carbon programs mechanically work and what they are intended to actually accomplish

In this publication:

  • Carbon credits are mechanisms to impose caps on emissions from certain industries.
  • Carbon offsets and sinks exist to help individuals and businesses balance out their impact.
  • Profitability and sustainability are becoming more aligned.

Why Do Carbon Efforts Matter?

  • The Paris Agreement, set in 2015, is the legally binding target of attempting to limit global warming to 1.5 to 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
  • The agreement was adopted by 197 countries and aims to achieve carbon neutrality by mid-century as a way to achieve this long-term temperature target.
  • The strategies in place to reach carbon neutrality combine carbon efficiency efforts from polluting industries (i.e. the reduction of pollution) with carbon sequestration techniques.Combining these two strategies has led to the concept of carbon neutral commitments, where corporations and governments define a date by which it commits to reach a net zero emission stance – where it either does not produce any greenhouse gas emissions, or the emissions it does are offset by some form of emission sequestration.

    Carbon commitments are broadly adopted:
  • One-fifth of the world’s largest 2,000 companies have already committed to carbon neutrality.
  • Countries covering as much as 70% of the global CO2 emissions have also made net-zero pledges.



As with most things environmentally related, this is easier said than done. Committing to carbon neutrality involves a combination of:

(a) ambitious emission optimisation efforts, and

(b) balancing of emissions with offsets, credits or sinks.

What products are already available to polluters?

Carbon Credits

Carbon credits are a cap, set by regulatory bodies, to the total amount of CO2 emissions generated by polluting industries. The purpose of carbon credits is to limit how much environmental impact economic activity has on the environment.

There are a few credit systems in place around the world – the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), the zero-emissions vehicles (ZEVs) credits in the U.S., and the Chinese nationwide credit trading system.

These trading systems work on the basis of credits supplied and controlled by the government or a similar managing authority, which are then distributed to polluters either for free or at a certain price.

The managing authority typically sets a limit to how many credits are issued every year (in order to contain pollution) and allocates them through the different players via grants (for free) or auctions (at a cost to the polluter). Once issued, the emissions credits can then be traded between players who need more emissions credits (heavily polluting players) and players who have more credits than emissions. Emissions credits have a market price in a similar way to stocks and bonds.



There are different forms of granting these credits. Some systems will award a set number of credits per player in the system (e.g. the EU ETS), while others will provide more credits to the good-doers and less to the bad-doers (e.g. the ZEV credits in the US). Either way, businesses underperforming in the environmental targets will be forced to acquire credits from the best-performers to meet the minimum required number of credits associated with their carbon intensity.

Carbon credits are sometimes confused with carbon taxes. Whilst the target is to reduce emissions through both mechanisms, carbon taxes give polluters price certainty (i.e. the regulator sets a fixed cost to each unit of pollution, but companies can pollute as much as they want) whilst carbon credits set quantity certainty (there is a capped amount of credits, and the price is set by the market), which is a materially better way to lead countries to comply with emission targets.

Carbon credits work as a subsidy to the good-doers (i.e. businesses generating little greenhouse gases, or businesses engaging actively in a transition to a greener economy) and as a fine to the bad-doers, but through a market efficient mechanism.

This is how Tesla came into the news recently by being a large recipient of ZEVs credits and selling these at a 100% profit to other carmakers in need of credits to meet the minimum threshold. In Europe the system is similar, though it targets a limited group of power plants and production industries (about 11,000 companies), allowing them to trade credits and auctioning and granting credits periodically.

Currently, there are no widely recognized fundamentals around how to value these credits, and the majority of the market is dominated by actual businesses that need to hedge their "pollution risk" rather than trying to speculate on the price of carbon credits. That said, there have been several high-profile investors (Andurand, Ek, or Lansdowne) that have been raising funds to allocate to the space. Hedge Funds own around 3%-6% of the carbon credits market, with the expectation of hoarding credits (in Europe they do not have an expiry date) to sell them at higher prices in the future.

Carbon Sinks

Reducing carbon emissions is essential to balance the carbon cycle. But looking at it from the other side of the equation – increasing the carbon sequestration on earth – is equally important.

Carbon sinks (or carbon capture certificates) are similar donation mechanisms as carbon offsets but target mostly projects (frequently associated with disruptive technologies) finding ways to sequester carbon rather than reduce its emission.



The tenure of the carbon capture projects usually impacts its price, with longer projects ending up being more costly.

See some examples:

  • Climeworks, a direct air capture technology, is estimated to cost almost $1,000 per tonne of CO2 sink, which is expected to sink those emissions perpetually.
  • Carbonfuture sells biochar sinks for about $100-120 per tonne, which is estimated to sink its emissions at least for 100 years.
  • Earthly or Pachama sell reforestation projects for as little as $10-20 per tonne, which are expected to have a limited carbon sequestration time horizon, given the long time gap for forest consolidation and the complex forest management system for long time horizons. The UN also has a portal to sell these – UN Carbon Offset Platform.

These new products have not yet hit massive market – unlike carbon credits, which have become an increasingly more liquid market, and carbon offsets, which can be easily found at e-commerce checkouts or flight booking platforms.

Carbon sinks are top of mind in the start-up world and leading businesses within the carbon transition space are making carbon sinking part of their CSR efforts. A clear leader being Stripe, which is creating yearly portfolios of carbon removal projects (total committed to date $9m, so not very significant) – from the simplest to the more complex – to drive corporate support into these disruptive scalable technologies.

All of this means that the carbon story is only starting and will become an ever more important thematic for investors, businesses, politicians, and entrepreneurs in the coming years. To us, the positive side of this is that governments are using open market mechanisms with financial implications to drive compliance of an environmental goal. The question of profitability and sustainability is, as a consequence, a touch more aligned.

Let's hope to continue to see progress on this in the future.

This article was originally puplished on The Lykeion. You can subscribe to their newsletter here.

Manuel Antunes
Manuel Antunes is a Nova SBE alumnus.
LEARN MORE
SHARE

Keep reading

The importance of data and statistic analysis to the achievement of the SDGs

This paper was written, by a student, as a brief discussion of one of the topics presented in the Global Impact Mindset: UN SDG Module of NOVA SBE. The importance of Data for the achievement of the SDGs is a consensual topic over demographic and organs. Decision-makers require data and statistics that are precise, timely, suitably disaggregated, pertinent, available, and simple to use to properly implement and track progress on the SDGs. Over time, both the quantity and quality of data have gradually increased. Data literacy must be improved at all levels of decision-making, and statistical competence still needs to be strengthened. The data producers and users from various data systems will need to work together on this. In order to solve the complex issues surrounding sustainable development, it will also be necessary to create new methods for producing and using data and statistics.

Thirst Project Nova SBE: Newsletter April

This is a quick read (2-3 minutes) on what are the new ways of approaching the fight against thirst not only around the world but also in Thirst Project Nova SBE. Get to know the new projects of this team of more than 20 students of Nova SBE that constantly try to move people into helping in this cause, also know how to help and how scientific innovation is playing a part on this matter.

Carbon Markets: Trading and Voluntary Schemes

Manuel Antunes clarifies the differences between trading and voluntary schemes, as well as pointing out what's great and less so about them.

THE CHOICES OF

Nova SBE awarded at the 1st edition of the EFFAS Gasperini Awards

Professors Miguel Ferreira and José Tavares and Nova SBE PhD student Sharmin Sazedj were awarded the first edition of the EFFAS Gasperini Awards, where they represented Nova SBE

Subscribe our weekly newsletter

By subscribing to the Nova SBE Role to Play newsletter, you can stay up-to-date on the latest articles posted on the website.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

We all have a role to play

We are on a mission to be a community dedicated to the development of talent and knowledge that impacts the world.

With just ten years to go, an ambitious global effort is underway to deliver the 2030 promise. We want to take a stand and we are calling on our community to showcase how they are contributing to the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, whilst influencing more and more people to unravel their role to play.

Here, you will find four different ways your ideas can flourish, dialogue can be enhanced, and action can take place. You can choose one or all four, and Nova SBE will be there to support you all the way and guarantee tangible change.

We all have a role to play, and this is your way in.