Opinion Article
Editorial from
Stefano Grancini
Associate Consultant at Nova Economics Club
November 16, 2022
8. Decent work and economic growth

8. Decent work and economic growth

Promote inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all

Does more confinement mean more or less savings?

More radical containment strategies may harm the economy in the short term but have more desirable economic and social consequences in the medium and long term. The exposed article results from the partnership between Jornal Económico and Nova Economics Club, the group of students of Economics of the Nova School of Business and Economics.

The Covid-19 pandemic that is plaguing the world may seem unique in the eyes of today's society, but the truth is that this is far from being an isolated event in history. On the contrary, in almost every century, similar phenomena are found, and there is no good news: pandemics will continue to happen and could become more recurrent, according to UNESCO.

In this sense, we must learn from the pandemics of the past and the current pandemic in order to be more prepared to deal with the emergence of what follows. Within Covid-19, countries responded to the health emergency in different ways. On the one hand, many of them decided to implement strong restrictive measures, seen as the only way to efficiently resolve the pandemic in their respective countries. On the other hand, some opted for milder measures, either because they feared a catastrophic impact on economic activity or because they preferred to try to end the pandemic through group immunity or even out of sheer carelessness in the face of one of the phenomena. Most striking of the 20th century.

Given the different approaches, the debate arises as to which of the two approaches has the most damaging effect on the economy. It has been assumed that strong restrictive measures destroy the economy, but is it still so? I invite the reader to consider the empirical evidence related to the 1918 flu pandemic brought by the article “Pandemics Depress the Economic, Public Health Interventions Do Not: Evidence from the 1918 Flu” (2020), in order to draw conclusions.

In this article, the authors compare the economic performance of different North American cities, which applied different containment measures, with the mortality rate, in the context of the 1918 flu pandemic.

According to this study, in the short term, there was no significant difference in economic activity between the locations that adopted more restrictive measures and those that did not. However, there is evidence that restrictive measures have had a positive effect on the economy in the medium term, which contradicts what is generally advocated.

The application of public health measures, such as the closure of trade, has direct and harmful effects on the economy by decreasing consumption. However, even if these measures were not taken, the intrinsic characteristics of a pandemic scenario, such as uncertainty and fear, would cause a reduction in investment by companies and consumption by families, so there would always be a contraction in economic activity. This may justify the fact that there are no significant differences between the two approaches in the short term.

However, the restrictions end up alleviating the original shock's impact - the pandemic itself - by decreasing the cumulative number of infections and deaths. Greater control over the epidemiological situation increases the feeling of security for families and companies, which ends up, ironically, saving the economy in the medium term.

Thus, the impact of this pandemic on future economic growth will always depend to a large extent on the efficiency of each government in its management. More radical containment strategies may harm the economy in the short term but have more desirable economic and social consequences in the medium and long term. If they choose the second strategy (less restrictions), it could be that the economy in the short term suffers less, but translates into uncertainty that has a negative impact in the medium term.

In short, and on a more positive note, according to Goldman Sachs, even in a scenario of restrictions almost as strong as those implemented in the first, economic growth will now be less penalized, arguing that “the sensitivity of economic activity to restrictions has decreased significantly since the first confinement ”.

Therefore, we must understand the profound changes that citizens and businesses have had to make in such a short period of time. The transition to digital business models, ways of working at a distance, as well as the conversion of workers from sectors in crisis to others in dizzying growth show the adaptability that the human species continues to have.

It remains for us now to create an economy more resilient to the crisis, more prepared for change, more agile in uncertainty, and sympathetic to those left behind.

This article was originally published in Portuguese here, Jornal Económico.

Stefano Grancini
Associate Consultant at Nova Economics Club

Keep reading

From flies in urinals to higher savings rates: How nudging influences our decisions

Nudging has been the start point of many economic studies, particularly in behavioral economics, as it explores how people´s decisions could significantly change predictably by modifying the context of such decisions in a very subtle form. The concept was first introduced by the Nobel Prizewinner Richard Thaler and Professor Cass Sunstein. However, Thaler stressed the point that nudging should be used for good, intending to improve society’s welfare, but has his wish become a reality?

Are Muslim immigrants really different? Experimental Evidence from Lebanon and Australia

Under the theme of Economic Development in Africa, the NOVAFRICA@Nova SBE seminar series hosts a variety of international speakers. This seminar invited Maleke Fourati, University of Geneva.

Now published: “Social Innovation and Social Enterprise”

This handbook compiles contributions of researchers in the field of social innovation and entrepreneurship like Anne-Laure Fayard, Miguel Pina e Cunha, Miguel Alves Martins, and Ricardo Zózimo, professors at Nova SBE

Essays on financial frictions

For the past forty years, the global economy has faced many challenges, including the increasing complexity and sophistication of financial markets, which created a new type of frictions that were in the origin of several recessive episodes such as the 2008 financial crisis. In her PhD thesis, Erica Marujo analyzes the role of financial frictions as a source of business cycle fluctuations.


Peak performance: Kilimanjaro leadership quest

In September 2023, Nova School of Business and Economics (Nova SBE) made history as 16 faculty and staff members embarked on an extraordinary journey — the Kilimanjaro Leadership Quest. This ambitious project saw the team conquer Africa's highest peak, Mount Kilimanjaro, imparting invaluable leadership, teamwork, and sustainability lessons.

Subscribe our weekly newsletter

By subscribing to the Nova SBE Role to Play newsletter, you can stay up-to-date on the latest articles posted on the website.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

We all have a role to play

We are on a mission to be a community dedicated to the development of talent and knowledge that impacts the world.

With just ten years to go, an ambitious global effort is underway to deliver the 2030 promise. We want to take a stand and we are calling on our community to showcase how they are contributing to the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, whilst influencing more and more people to unravel their role to play.

Here, you will find four different ways your ideas can flourish, dialogue can be enhanced, and action can take place. You can choose one or all four, and Nova SBE will be there to support you all the way and guarantee tangible change.

We all have a role to play, and this is your way in.