Health
Research insight
INVITED EDITOR
Editorial from
Joana Pestana and Eduardo Costa
Joana Pestana is a PhD Candidate in Economics & Researcher at Nova SBE Health Economics & Management Knowledge Center; Eduardo Costa is an Adjunct Assistant Professor & Associate Research Member at Nova SBE Health Economics & Management Knowledge Center
July 16, 2024
3. Good health and well-being

3. Good health and well-being

Ensuring access to quality health and promoting well-being for all, at all ages
LEARN MORE

The promise of a family doctor for all, a complex undertaking – why are we still so far?

What we know so far, and what are the factors behind this issue. Let’s look at the numbers!

Attributing a Family Doctor to each patient in Portugal is a much-discussed challenge that jumped to the limelight in the 2022 political debates. This electoral promise, though simple to understand, has been a complex undertaking given the myriad of factors contributing to it. We consider three factors contributing to the number of patients without a family doctor (1) the increase in the number of patients enrolled in Primary Health Care (PHC); (2) new doctor hires; (3) the reduction in the average number of patients with a family doctor per doctor (which roughly captures the size of the patients’ list per doctor).

Currently, one in every ten citizens enrolled in PHC has no family doctor assigned. Despite the worsening of the situation over the last two years, most regions are better off than they were a decade ago (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Percentage of citizens enrolled in PHC without a family doctor by Regional Health Administration (ARS)

When decomposing the evolution of patients without family doctors by the factors mentioned above we observe that between the end of 2015 and 2021: (1)additional 242 thousand citizens entered the PHC system, rising the need for doctors; (2) almost 327 family doctors were hired (net of retirements and other leavings), thus increasing the capacity to absorb the new demand; (3) however, in the opposite direction, there has been a progressive reduction in the average number of patients with a doctor per doctor (Fig.2).

Fig. 2. Waterfall graph representing the evolution of the number of patients enrolled in PHC without a family doctor (2015 - 2021)

The hiring of new doctors over this period would have been enough to offset the new patients' demand and to reduce to some extent the size of the population already waiting for a doctor. Since the opposite occurred, i.e., roughly 380 thousand more patients are now without a doctor, we must conclude that there has been an aggregated shrinking in the number of patients followed per doctor. This does not imply that each doctor treats fewer patients than before. There is substantial heterogeneity, and some aspects contributing to this national trend may affect some areas more than others.

Let us consider some aspects that may contribute to the shrinking average of patients followed per doctor. Hiring family doctors (e.g., from the university or abroad) has been a key policy. However, this strategy alone hasn’t proved to be a panacea to provide a family doctor for all. New hires may contribute to easing the number of patients without a doctor or providing care to pre-existing unmet needs of the population already followed in the unit.

Moreover, it is important to understand whether the geographic location chosen by the doctors to practice poses limitations to the expansion of care to further patients. Furthermore, the problem of attracting and retaining doctors in remote or underserved areas has been recognized by the Health Ministry that in 2017 reformulated an incentive scheme to award doctors moving to these areas(yet the effectiveness of this program is still uncertain). Alternatively, the shifting distribution of doctors between organizational models of PHC units may also play an important role.

Doctors practicing in Personalized Health Care Units typically have lists with fewer patients but follow more patients without a doctor, whether those practicing in Family Health Units follow larger lists, but typically provide limited services to the population without a doctor. Finally, demographic changes and the migratory balance occurring in Portugal might distort the human resources policy efforts. The aging population contributes to the increase in the complexity of the patients in doctors’ lists due to their care needs. As a result, a doctor that has a list composed of mostly elderly people and children will necessarily follow fewer patients than a doctor who follows a predominantly adult population.

To better understand why, despite all efforts, many patients do not have a family doctor, one must first understand the interplay of geographic, organizational, and demographic factors contributing to this number.

This research was featured on the news.

Author's websites:

     Joana Pestana

    Eduardo Costa

Joana Pestana and Eduardo Costa
Joana Pestana is a PhD Candidate in Economics & Researcher at Nova SBE Health Economics & Management Knowledge Center; Eduardo Costa is an Adjunct Assistant Professor & Associate Research Member at Nova SBE Health Economics & Management Knowledge Center
LEARN MORE
SHARE

Keep reading

PhD Series: Meet Sara Almeida

Sara is a recent alumni of Nova SBE, having recently completed her PhD in Economics. In this video, you can listen to her testimony regarding not only the program itself, but also regarding her experience in using her thesis to answer impactful questions.

Leveraging technology to reach global health: The case of telemedicine in São Tomé and Príncipe health system

Cátia Gonçalves, Ph.D candidate at Nova SBE and researcher at Health Management & Economics Knowledge Center, published recently a research paper on Health Policy and Technology.

Home support and spouse’s health

The increase in the average life expectancy and the number of years that people live with a greater or lesser degree of dependence translate into an increasing need for long-term care, which is provided in a formal or informal way.

No to fake news, yes to scientific evidence

It is important to recognize the potential of technology in the contribution it can make to increase health literacy. However, as with the news, one must look at the source of the content and say: no to fake news, yes to scientific evidence.

THE CHOICES OF

Nova SBE awarded at the 1st edition of the EFFAS Gasperini Awards

Professors Miguel Ferreira and José Tavares and Nova SBE PhD student Sharmin Sazedj were awarded the first edition of the EFFAS Gasperini Awards, where they represented Nova SBE

Subscribe our weekly newsletter

By subscribing to the Nova SBE Role to Play newsletter, you can stay up-to-date on the latest articles posted on the website.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

We all have a role to play

We are on a mission to be a community dedicated to the development of talent and knowledge that impacts the world.

With just ten years to go, an ambitious global effort is underway to deliver the 2030 promise. We want to take a stand and we are calling on our community to showcase how they are contributing to the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, whilst influencing more and more people to unravel their role to play.

Here, you will find four different ways your ideas can flourish, dialogue can be enhanced, and action can take place. You can choose one or all four, and Nova SBE will be there to support you all the way and guarantee tangible change.

We all have a role to play, and this is your way in.